India-Nepal Relations: Diplomatic Challenges

Overview
India and Nepal share a relationship deeply rooted in historical, cultural, and geographical ties. This relationship has evolved significantly from the early 20th century through the 21st century, marked by cooperation and conflict. Both countries have navigated a complex interplay of diplomacy, security, and economics, influenced by their historical context and contemporary developments. This article by Academic Block will looks into the intricate dynamics of India-Nepal relations, exploring their historical roots, key milestones, and the current state of affairs.
Historical Context
Early 20th Century
The early 20th century was a period of transformation for Nepal and its relationship with India. During British colonial rule, Nepal maintained a unique status as a semi-independent kingdom under British suzerainty. India’s relationship with Nepal was relatively indirect, influenced by the broader context of British imperial interests in the region. Despite this indirect relationship, the proximity and cultural ties between the two nations laid the groundwork for future interactions.
Post-Independence Era (1947-1960s)
The end of British rule in 1947 marked the beginning of a new era for India and Nepal. With India's independence, the bilateral relationship took on a more direct and formal dimension. The 1950 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship was a cornerstone of this new phase. The treaty established a framework for cooperation in defense, trade, and political matters, reflecting the close ties and mutual interests between the two countries.
However, the treaty also reflected India's significant influence over Nepal. The political landscape in Nepal began to shift with the rise of democratic movements and the end of the Rana regime. Nepal’s transition from a monarchy under the Rana rule to a democratic monarchy in 1951 created new dynamics in its relations with India.
The 1960s to 1980s: Growth and Challenges
Political Shifts and Diplomatic Developments
The 1960s and 1970s were marked by significant political changes in Nepal. The country experienced a shift from a democratic monarchy to a more centralized monarchy under King Mahendra’s regime. During this period, Nepal’s foreign policy was largely influenced by India’s geopolitical stance. India’s support for Nepal in the face of external pressures, particularly from China, was a key aspect of their relationship.
In the 1980s, Nepal continued to navigate its relationship with India amidst domestic political changes. The rise of popular movements for democratic reforms within Nepal, coupled with India's increasing involvement in South Asian politics, created a complex environment for bilateral relations. India’s support for democratic movements in Nepal was a significant factor, reflecting its broader regional policy goals.
Economic and Strategic Cooperation
Economic and strategic cooperation between India and Nepal grew during this period. India played a crucial role in Nepal’s development by providing economic aid and support for infrastructure projects. The establishment of trade agreements and joint ventures further strengthened the economic ties between the two nations. Nepal’s reliance on India for trade and transit, given their shared border, was a fundamental aspect of their economic relationship.
The 1990s: A New Phase of Cooperation and Conflict
Democratic Transition in Nepal
The 1990s marked a pivotal period in Nepal’s history with the transition from a constitutional monarchy to a federal democratic republic. The end of the Panchayat system and the establishment of a multiparty democracy in 1990 brought significant changes to Nepal’s political landscape. This transition had profound implications for India-Nepal relations.
India supported Nepal’s democratic transition and maintained a close relationship with the new government. However, the relationship also faced challenges, particularly regarding Nepal’s internal political dynamics and its relations with other regional powers. India’s perceived influence over Nepal’s political processes occasionally led to tensions and accusations of interference.
Maoist Insurgency and Its Impact
The rise of the Maoist insurgency in Nepal in the late 1990s and early 2000s introduced new challenges to India-Nepal relations. The insurgency, led by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), posed a threat to Nepal’s stability and had implications for regional security. India, concerned about the potential spread of insurgency and its impact on its own security, closely monitored the situation.
During this period, India’s support for the Nepalese government and its efforts to combat the insurgency were significant aspects of their relationship. The Maoist insurgency highlighted the complexities of India-Nepal relations, with security concerns and regional stability playing a central role.
21st Century: Evolving Dynamics
Post-Maoist Era and Political Developments
The early 21st century saw significant political developments in Nepal, including the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of a federal democratic republic in 2008. The political transition and the drafting of a new constitution in 2015 marked a new phase in Nepal’s political evolution. India played a supportive role during these transitions, emphasizing its commitment to Nepal’s democratic process.
However, the relationship between India and Nepal faced strains during this period. The 2015 blockade, which Nepal accused India of orchestrating in response to the new constitution, was a major point of contention. The blockade led to a humanitarian crisis in Nepal and strained diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Economic Cooperation and Regional Integration
Economic cooperation continued to be a cornerstone of India-Nepal relations in the 21st century. India remained a major trading partner and provider of development aid to Nepal. The countries worked on various projects, including infrastructure development, energy cooperation, and trade facilitation.
Regional integration also became a focus of bilateral relations. India supported Nepal’s participation in regional organizations such as the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). These platforms provided opportunities for enhanced cooperation and dialogue between India and Nepal.
Border Disputes and Diplomatic Tensions
Border disputes and diplomatic tensions have periodically affected India-Nepal relations. Disagreements over the demarcation of borders, particularly in areas such as Kalapani and Lipulekh, have led to diplomatic spats and public protests. These disputes highlight the ongoing challenges in managing bilateral relations and the complexities of historical and geographical factors.
Cultural and Social Ties
India and Nepal share profound cultural, religious, and linguistic affinities. Hinduism and Buddhism serve as strong cultural connectors, with millions of pilgrims traveling between the two countries to visit sacred sites like Pashupatinath Temple in Kathmandu and the birthplace of Lord Buddha in Lumbini.
The open border policy allows citizens to move freely, fostering interpersonal relationships and trade. Intermarriages between Indian and Nepali families have further strengthened these ties, creating a unique socio-cultural dynamic that transcends national boundaries. The shared festivals, rituals, and languages underscore the deeply intertwined nature of their societies.
Water Resources and Hydropower Cooperation Between India and Nepal
Water resources and hydropower cooperation have long been integral to the India-Nepal relationship due to the countries' shared river systems. The Himalayas' snow-fed rivers, such as the Ganga, Koshi, Gandaki, and Mahakali, flow from Nepal into India, creating opportunities for mutual benefit in irrigation, flood control, and energy generation. However, these shared resources have also been sources of contention, requiring careful diplomatic and technical management.
Significance of Shared Rivers
Nepal, with its vast hydropower potential of over 83,000 megawatts, is often referred to as the "water tower" of South Asia. The shared rivers are lifelines for millions of people in both countries, supporting agriculture, drinking water, and energy needs. For India, these rivers are crucial for irrigation in northern states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, while Nepal views them as vital for its economic development through hydropower exports.
Key Agreements and Treaties
-
Koshi Agreement (1954) : The Koshi River is one of the major transboundary rivers. The 1954 Koshi Agreement facilitated the construction of the Koshi Barrage in Nepal to manage flood control and irrigation in India. While the project has benefitted Indian farmers, Nepali stakeholders have often criticized the agreement for not adequately addressing their interests, such as compensation and local benefits.
-
Gandak Agreement (1959) : The Gandak Treaty enabled the construction of a barrage to manage water distribution for irrigation and hydropower. Like the Koshi Agreement, this treaty has been contentious, with Nepali parties expressing concerns over its unequal benefits.
-
Mahakali Treaty (1996) : One of the most significant agreements, the Mahakali Treaty, governs the equitable utilization of the Mahakali River. It covers projects such as the Tanakpur Barrage and the proposed Pancheshwar Multipurpose Project. The treaty aims to ensure mutual benefits in hydropower generation, irrigation, and flood control. However, delays in implementing the Pancheshwar Project have hindered the treaty’s full potential.
Hydropower Projects
-
Arun III Hydropower Project : A major success in India-Nepal cooperation, this 900 MW project is being developed by India’s Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited (SJVN). It represents a milestone in harnessing Nepal’s hydropower potential and facilitating energy exports to India.
-
Upper Karnali Hydropower Project : This project, involving Indian companies, is another example of cooperation. It aims to generate 900 MW of electricity, with Nepal expected to benefit from free energy and royalties.
-
Budhi Gandaki and Other Proposed Projects : Nepal has explored additional projects with Indian investments, highlighting the potential for deeper collaboration.
Security and Counter-Terrorism Cooperation
Security and counter-terrorism cooperation form a critical pillar of India-Nepal relations. The open border, shared geopolitical vulnerabilities, and the rise of transnational threats necessitate robust collaboration to address mutual security concerns. Over the years, both nations have worked together to enhance their security mechanisms, strengthen intelligence-sharing, and combat cross-border crimes.
Open Border and Security Challenges
The 1,800-kilometer open border is both a symbol of trust and a potential vulnerability. While it fosters people-to-people ties and economic activity, it has also been exploited by criminal networks for smuggling, human trafficking, and illegal trade. Moreover, the porous nature of the border creates challenges in monitoring the movement of extremist elements and preventing infiltration by anti-national groups.
Addressing Cross-Border Crimes
India and Nepal have engaged in coordinated efforts to tackle cross-border crimes. Joint security mechanisms, such as border security coordination meetings between the Indian Border Security Force (BSF) and Nepalese Armed Police Force (APF), have been institutionalized to address these issues. Enhanced border patrols and regular exchanges between local officials aim to curb illegal activities while maintaining the open border's sanctity.
Counter-Terrorism Collaboration
Counter-terrorism has gained prominence in bilateral relations due to the growing threat of extremist groups operating across South Asia. India has raised concerns about the potential use of Nepalese territory by anti-India elements, including insurgent groups and terror organizations. In response, Nepal has committed to ensuring that its territory is not used for activities that threaten India's security.
Both countries actively share intelligence on terrorist activities, coordinate law enforcement actions, and conduct joint operations against organized crime. Notable efforts include cracking down on terror financing, arms smuggling, and sleeper cells operating in border regions.
The Role of Gurkhas
The Gurkha regiments in the Indian Army are a unique symbol of the deep-rooted trust and respect between India and Nepal. Thousands of Nepalis serve in the Indian Army under a tradition dating back to the colonial era. This arrangement provides Nepalese citizens with stable employment and income while contributing to India's security. The pensions and other benefits received by retired Gurkhas form a significant economic link between the two nations.
However, the Gurkha issue has occasionally sparked domestic debates in Nepal, with some questioning its impact on Nepal’s sovereignty. Yet, the overwhelming sentiment remains one of pride in the contributions of Gurkhas to India’s defense.
Geopolitical Sensitivities
The proximity of Nepal to China adds a layer of complexity to its security policies. India has encouraged Nepal to balance its relationships with regional powers while remaining vigilant against external influences that could destabilize the region. The growing role of China in Nepal's security infrastructure, including training programs and equipment supply, has been a point of concern for India.
Capacity Building and Training
India has played a significant role in strengthening Nepal’s security capabilities. Through programs like the Indian Technical and Economic Cooperation (ITEC), Nepalese police and armed forces receive training in counter-terrorism, border management, and intelligence analysis. India also provides assistance in upgrading Nepal’s security infrastructure, such as surveillance systems and communication networks, to bolster its capacity to address modern security threats.
Significance of Cooperation
Security and counter-terrorism collaboration is essential for regional stability. By addressing shared challenges, India and Nepal can ensure the safety of their populations, secure their borders, and prevent external actors from exploiting vulnerabilities. Continued cooperation in this area will not only strengthen bilateral ties but also contribute to the broader security architecture of South Asia.
Current State of Affairs and Future Prospects
Recent Developments and Bilateral Initiatives
In recent years, India and Nepal have worked to address challenges and strengthen their bilateral relationship. Diplomatic engagements, high-level visits, and collaborative projects have aimed at improving ties. The countries have focused on resolving border disputes through dialogue and enhancing economic cooperation.
The COVID-19 pandemic also impacted India-Nepal relations, with both countries collaborating on health-related issues and supporting each other during the crisis. The pandemic highlighted the importance of cross-border cooperation and the need for continued dialogue and collaboration.
Future Directions
Looking ahead, the future of India-Nepal relations will likely be shaped by several factors. Addressing border disputes, fostering economic cooperation, and enhancing regional integration will be crucial for strengthening ties. The evolving geopolitical landscape in South Asia, including the roles of other regional powers, will also influence the dynamics of India-Nepal relations.
Both countries have a shared interest in maintaining stability, promoting economic growth, and enhancing cooperation in various fields. The relationship will benefit from continued dialogue, mutual respect, and a commitment to addressing challenges collaboratively.
Final Words
India-Nepal relations have undergone significant transformations from the early 20th century to the present. The historical, cultural, and geographical ties between the two countries have played a fundamental role in shaping their relationship. While the bilateral relationship has faced challenges and tensions, it has also demonstrated resilience and cooperation.
As India and Nepal navigate the complexities of the 21st century, their relationship will continue to evolve. Addressing historical grievances, fostering economic cooperation, and enhancing regional integration will be key to strengthening their ties and building a mutually beneficial partnership. The future of India-Nepal relations will depend on the ability of both countries to manage their differences, seize opportunities for collaboration, and work together for the common good of their peoples. We would love to hear your thoughts in the comments below to help us make this article better. Your feedback is important to us. Thank you for Reading!
This Article will answer your questions like:
India's relationship with Nepal is characterized by a complex interplay of historical ties, cultural connections, and strategic interests. While traditionally strong, the relationship has faced challenges, particularly regarding border disputes and political dynamics. India remains a key partner for Nepal in trade, investment, and development assistance, with ongoing cooperation in security and infrastructure. Both countries continue to engage diplomatically, balancing national interests while striving to strengthen their partnership, reflecting a commitment to mutual respect and regional stability.
Nepal holds strategic significance for India due to its geographical location, sharing a long border with several Indian states. The nation acts as a buffer between India and China, particularly important in the context of increasing Chinese influence in the region. Additionally, Nepal is crucial for India’s security strategy, facilitating cooperation on border management and counter-terrorism efforts. Economic ties, including trade and energy collaboration, further enhance its strategic importance, as India seeks to maintain stability and foster development in Nepal while countering external influences.
The dispute between India and Nepal primarily centers around territorial claims, particularly regarding Kalapani, Limpiyadhura, and Lipulekh. The disagreement intensified in 2019 when India published a new political map incorporating these areas, leading Nepal to release its own map claiming the disputed territories. This territorial issue is rooted in historical treaties and differing interpretations of boundaries. The dispute has affected diplomatic relations, leading to heightened tensions and calls for dialogue to resolve the longstanding border issues and enhance bilateral trust.
Key milestones in India-Nepal relations during the 20th century include the 1950 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which laid the foundation for cooperation. The 1961 Economic Cooperation Agreement facilitated economic ties, while the 1990 democratic transition in Nepal strengthened people-to-people connections. The 2001 royal massacre led to political instability, impacting bilateral relations. Additionally, India's support for Nepal during the 2006 Maoist insurgency and subsequent peace process reinforced its commitment to Nepal's stability and development, reflecting the evolving nature of their partnership.
The 1950 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship significantly impacted bilateral relations by establishing a framework for cooperation in defense, trade, and cultural exchange. It ensured mutual security, allowing for Indian military assistance in times of need. The treaty fostered closer ties, promoting people-to-people connections and economic collaboration. However, it has also been criticized in Nepal for perceived Indian dominance, influencing domestic politics and national identity, leading to calls for re-evaluating the terms of the treaty in contemporary contexts.
The 2015 Nepal blockade by India was primarily caused by protests against Nepal's new constitution, perceived as marginalizing certain ethnic groups, particularly the Madhesi community along the India-Nepal border. The blockade resulted in severe shortages of essential goods, including fuel and medicine, leading to widespread criticism in Nepal of India's role. This incident strained bilateral relations and prompted calls for greater sovereignty in Nepal's domestic affairs. The blockade underscored the need for India to balance its strategic interests with Nepal’s aspirations for national identity and autonomy.
The Maoist insurgency in Nepal during the early 2000s significantly influenced India-Nepal relations by complicating security dynamics and fostering concerns over regional stability. India initially supported the Nepalese government in combating the insurgency, fearing a spillover effect on its own Maoist insurgency. However, as the conflict evolved, India faced pressure to adopt a more neutral stance, advocating for peace talks. This period highlighted the delicate balance India had to maintain between supporting the Nepalese state and respecting the aspirations of the Nepali people for democracy and social justice.
Current border disputes between India and Nepal primarily revolve around Kalapani, Limpiyadhura, and Lipulekh, areas claimed by both nations. Tensions escalated in 2019 when India published a new political map incorporating these territories, prompting Nepal to assert its claims with a new map of its own. The disputes are rooted in historical treaties and differing interpretations of boundary demarcations, complicating diplomatic relations. Both countries have engaged in discussions to resolve the disputes, but the issue remains sensitive, reflecting national pride and historical grievances on both sides.
In the 21st century, economic cooperation between India and Nepal has evolved significantly, focusing on trade, investment, and infrastructure development. India has emerged as Nepal's largest trading partner, with growing investments in various sectors, including energy, transportation, and telecommunications. Collaborative projects like the Terai and rail connectivity initiatives have strengthened ties. India’s development assistance, including grants and loans, supports infrastructure and social projects, reflecting a commitment to Nepal's economic growth and development while fostering deeper interdependence and cooperation between the two nations.
India played a significant role in Nepal’s transition from a monarchy to a federal democratic republic, particularly during the political upheaval in the mid-2000s. India supported the democratic movement, advocating for a peaceful resolution to the conflict between the monarchy and Maoist insurgents. Following the 2006 peace agreement, India encouraged the establishment of a new democratic framework, providing political support and development assistance. This involvement aimed to stabilize Nepal and promote democratic governance, reflecting India’s interest in a politically stable and friendly neighbor.
Controversies Associated with India-Nepal Relations
The 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship: The 1950 Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship has been a point of contention, with some Nepali critics arguing that it disproportionately favors India and impinges on Nepal’s sovereignty. The treaty, which was intended to provide security and trade benefits, has been viewed by some as giving India undue influence over Nepal’s internal affairs.
The 2015 Nepal Blockade: In 2015, India was accused of imposing a blockade on Nepal in response to Nepal’s new constitution, which India claimed discriminated against the Madhesi community living along the border. The blockade led to severe shortages of essential goods and humanitarian crises in Nepal, straining diplomatic relations and leading to widespread anti-India sentiment in Nepal.
Kalapani and Lipulekh Disputes: The territorial disputes over Kalapani and Lipulekh regions have been a significant source of tension. The disagreement over the borders, particularly after India published a new map in 2019 claiming these areas, has led to diplomatic protests and public demonstrations in Nepal, further straining bilateral relations.
Sugauli Treaty Interpretation: The interpretation of the Sugauli Treaty of 1815, which defined the boundary between British India and Nepal, has been contested over time. Disagreements over the treaty’s provisions and their application have contributed to ongoing disputes about border demarcation and territorial claims.
Water Resource Management: Conflicts over the management of shared river resources, particularly regarding the Koshi and Gandak rivers, have caused disputes. Issues related to water sharing agreements, flood control, and river management have often been sources of tension between the two countries.
Political Influence and Interference: Accusations of political interference by India in Nepal’s internal affairs have been a recurring controversy. Nepalese political parties and leaders have occasionally accused India of attempting to influence domestic politics or undermine Nepal’s sovereignty, particularly during periods of political transition.
Trade and Economic Issues: Economic disagreements have occasionally arisen, including issues related to trade barriers, transit rights, and economic aid. Disputes over trade agreements and their implementation have sometimes created friction, affecting bilateral economic relations.
Key Treaties and Agreements Between India and Nepal
Treaty of Sugauli (1815): Although this treaty was signed between the British East India Company and the Kingdom of Nepal, it is crucial as it defined the modern borders of Nepal, including areas of strategic importance to both India and Nepal.
1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship: This treaty laid the foundation for modern India-Nepal relations. It included provisions for mutual security cooperation, economic assistance, and privileges for citizens of both countries, such as free movement across the border, residence, property rights, and participation in trade and commerce.
1954 Koshi River Agreement: This agreement aimed at the construction and management of a barrage on the Koshi River for flood control, irrigation, and hydropower generation. It was revised in 1966 to address Nepal’s concerns about sovereignty and economic benefits.
1964 Gandak Agreement: This agreement focused on the construction of a barrage and canal systems for irrigation and flood control on the Gandak River, enhancing agricultural productivity in both countries.
1987 Mahakali Treaty (Tanakpur Agreement): The agreement dealt with the utilization of the waters of the Mahakali River for irrigation and hydropower generation. It was later expanded into a comprehensive treaty in 1996.
1996 Mahakali Treaty: Also known as the Integrated Development of the Mahakali River Treaty, this comprehensive agreement covered the Sarada Barrage, the Tanakpur Barrage, and the Pancheswar Project, aiming at water resources development, including energy generation and irrigation.
Trade and Transit Treaties (Various Years): India and Nepal have signed multiple treaties and agreements to facilitate trade and transit, given Nepal’s landlocked status. Notable ones include the Trade and Transit Treaty of 1991, which was renewed and updated in subsequent years, most recently in 2016.
BIPPA (Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement) – 2011: This agreement was designed to promote and protect bilateral investments, ensuring fair and equitable treatment to investors from both countries and facilitating a conducive environment for investment.
Electric Power Trade, Cross-Border Transmission and Grid Connectivity Agreement – 2014: This agreement established a framework for cooperation in power trade between India and Nepal, allowing for the export and import of electricity, the development of cross-border transmission lines, and ensuring grid connectivity.
Raxaul-Kathmandu Railway Project – 2018: This agreement aimed at enhancing connectivity through the construction of a new railway line from Raxaul in India to Kathmandu in Nepal, facilitating trade and people-to-people contacts.
Facts on India-Nepal Relations
1. 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship
- Date: Signed on July 31, 1950.
- Significance: Established a special relationship, allowing open borders and mutual cooperation on security matters. Citizens of both countries were granted reciprocal rights to reside, work, and own property in each other’s territories.
2. Nepalese Revolution of 1951
- Event: End of the Rana autocracy.
- Impact: With India’s support, Nepal transitioned to a constitutional monarchy, enhancing bilateral ties and establishing democratic governance.
3. 1960 King Mahendra’s Coup
- Event: King Mahendra dissolved the democratic government.
- Outcome: Tensions arose between India and Nepal as the Panchayat system replaced democratic institutions. India had been supportive of democratic reforms in Nepal.
4. 1962 Sino-Indian War
- Impact: Influenced Nepal’s foreign policy and strategic calculations.
- Nepal’s Stance: Maintained neutrality, balancing its relations between the two neighboring giants, India and China.
5. 1989-1990 Trade and Transit Dispute
- Event: India imposed an economic blockade.
- Outcome: Led to significant economic hardship in Nepal and fueled anti-India sentiments. The dispute was resolved, leading to improved bilateral relations and support for Nepal’s pro-democracy movement.
6. 2006 Comprehensive Peace Accord
- Event: End of the decade-long Maoist insurgency in Nepal.
- India’s Role: Supported the peace process, facilitating Nepal’s transition to a federal democratic republic.
7. 2008 Abolition of Monarchy
- Event: Nepal declared a federal democratic republic.
- Impact: India welcomed the new political system and continued to support Nepal’s democratic transition.
8. 2015 Nepal Earthquake
- Event: A devastating earthquake struck Nepal on April 25, 2015.
- India’s Response: Provided extensive humanitarian aid, including rescue operations, medical supplies, and financial assistance for reconstruction, reinforcing its role as a key partner in Nepal’s recovery.
9. 2015-2016 Madhesi Agitation and Blockade
- Event: Protests by the Madhesi community led to a blockade of supplies from India.
- Impact: Strained bilateral relations as Nepal accused India of imposing an undeclared blockade. The situation highlighted ethnic and political complexities within Nepal and its dependence on Indian trade routes.
10. 2019 Border Dispute
- Event: Nepal released a new map including disputed territories like Kalapani, Lipulekh, and Limpiyadhura.
- Outcome: Led to diplomatic tensions with India. Both nations have since been engaged in dialogue to resolve the territorial issues.
Academic References on India-Nepal Relations
- Baral, L. R. (2010). Nepal – Nation-State in the Wilderness: Managing State, Democracy, and Geopolitics. SAGE Publications India.
- Bhattarai, G. (2018). Geopolitics of Nepal and International Responses to Conflict Transformation. Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Dixit, K. M., & Ramachandaran, S. (2002). State of Nepal. Himal Books.
- Dixit, K. M. (1997). Foreign Policy of Nepal: An Exploratory Study. Sangam Books.
- Jha, P. (2014). Battles of the New Republic: A Contemporary History of Nepal. Aleph Book Company.
- Kumar, S. (2014). India and Nepal: Treaty of Peace and Friendship (1950) – Interrogating the Relationship. Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy, 2(2), 67-85.
- Malone, D. M., & Mukherjee, R. (2010). Polity, Security, and Foreign Policy in Contemporary Nepal. Asian Survey, 50(6), 1100-1119.
- Mishra, R. (2004). India’s Role in Nepal’s Maoist Insurgency. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 60(1-2), 123-141.
- Mukherjee, R., & Malone, D. M. (2011). Nepal: Trapped in Its Geography?. In Nepal in Transition: From People’s War to Fragile Peace (pp. 45-66). Cambridge University Press.
- Pahari, A. (2012). Nepal and India: Conflict and Cooperation in a Complex Relationship. In South Asia in the World: An Introduction (pp. 237-255). Routledge.
- Pandey, R. N. (2005). Foreign Policy of Nepal. Adroit Publishers.
- Sharma, S. R. (2011). The Maoist Movement in Nepal and India’s Security Concerns. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 67(1), 47-67.
- Thapa, D. (2003). Understanding the Maoist Movement of Nepal. Modern Asian Studies, 37(3), 661-668.
- Upadhya, S. (2012). The Raj Lives: India in Nepal’s Recent Past. The Journal of Asian Studies, 71(3), 749-771.